Serendipitously, the following article was submitted to the alt.polyamory newsgroup today. I can't tell whether it was reprinted with permission or not. I looked around Google a bit for a possible official web published copy I could just link to, but indeed I found a great deal of mention of the author's controversial stance as an "AIDS Dissident."
I'm going to post this anyway, in its entirety and with proper attribution, and if I cause offense or harm, I hope to work it out with parties involved.
If It's Not HIV, What Can Cause AIDS?
by Christine Maggiore
Contrary to popular belief, HIV is not necessary to explain acquired
immune deficiency and the illnesses associated with AIDS. To
understand why this is so, it is first necessary to understand what
AIDS is. AIDS is not a new disease or illness; it is a new name or
designation for 29 previously known diseases and conditions. As the
NIH states in its comprehensive report on AIDS, "the designation
'AIDS' is a surveillance tool."191 Since 1981, the surveillance tool
AIDS has been used to track and record familiar diseases when they
appear in people who have tested positive for antibodies associated
with HIV.
The AIDS virus hypothesis supposes that the health problems renamed
AIDS develop as a result of infection with HIV; that the virus somehow
disables the body's defense system that protects against opportunistic
illness, allowing the development of one or more of 29 diseases-such
as yeast infection, certain cancers, pneumonia, salmonella, diarrhea,
or tuberculosis-which are then diagnosed as AIDS. However, every AIDS
indicator disease occurs among people who test HIV negative-none are
exclusive to those who test positive- and all AIDS diseases existed
before the adoption of the name "AIDS."
Prior to the designation AIDS, these 29 diseases were not thought to
have a single, common cause. In fact, all have recognized causes and
treatments that are unrelated to HIV. For example, yeast infection is
a widespread problem due to an imbalance of natural bacteria. The
yeast infections that occur in people who test HIV positive and in
people who test HIV negative are caused by the same imbalance of
natural bacteria. All the opportunistic illnesses called AIDS have
various, medically proven causes that do not involve HIV.
Immune deficiency can be acquired by several risk factors that are not
infectious or transmitted through blood or blood products. The
following factors are widely recognized causes of immune suppression,
compromised health, and opportunistic infections, as documented in the
medical literature for more than 70 years. Chronic, habitual and
multiple exposures to these risks can cause the group of symptoms
called AIDS.192 In fact, there is no case of AIDS described in the
medical literature without one or more of these health risk
factors.193
Physical Risk Factors
These risks include malnutrition and chronic lack of sleep. In 1985,
orthodox AIDS researcher and director of NIAID, Dr. Anthony Fauci
declared that malnutrition was the most prevalent cause of immune
deficiency diseases throughout the world, particularly in developing
regions such as Africa where common illnesses like measles run rampant
and take millions of lives.194
The medical literature notes that malnutrition and infection are
invariably linked, as one condition aggravates the other. Hunger and
endemic disease are familiar problems in those countries around the
globe thought to be under siege from AIDS. Intrauterine malnutrition
occurs when expectant mothers are improperly nourished, and can result
in prolonged, sometimes lifelong, immune suppression.195
Poverty, crowded living conditions and unclean water promote endemic
disease and compromised health. The populations in many developing
regions of the world are devastated by rampant infections with common
microbes that pose little or no health threat to people in
industrialized nations.
Infections due to malnutrition immunodeficiency are the world's
leading causes of infant and child death.195 Among citizens of
industrialized nations, subclinical malnutrition, rather than
starvation leads to compromised immune function, especially when
combined with chronic lack of sleep.196 People who make habitual and
prolonged use of certain drugs like methamphetamines, heroin and crack
cocaine often suffer from malnutrition and chronic lack of sleep.
Chemical Risk Factors
Immune-compromising chemicals include pharmaceutical drugs such as AZT
and other cancer chemotherapy compounds, protease inhibitors,
antibiotics and steroids, and recreational drugs such as cocaine,
crack, heroin, nitrites (poppers), and methamphetamines (crystal,
speed).
Chemotherapy targets and destroys the bone marrow cells from which all
immune cells derive. They also kill fully formed immune cells in
addition to killing B cells and red blood cells.196,197 Chemotherapy
destroys the digestive system by killing the cells that compose the
inner lining of the digestive tract which interferes with the body's
ability to absorb and digest nutrients, causing malnutrition. Even
when used very briefly, chemotherapy suppresses normal immune
function, increases susceptibility to a variety of opportunistic
infections, and can cause life-threatening anemia and diarrhea. AZT,
ddI, ddC, D4T and 3TC are all chemotherapy compounds used as antiviral
AIDS treatments.
There are many pharmaceutical drugs known to suppress the immune
system, particularly when used for prolonged periods of time. Protease
inhibitors cause impaired liver function and liver failure (the liver
removes disease-causing toxins from the body) in addition to kidney
failure, dangerously high cholesterol levels, diarrhea and other
health-compromising effects. Steroids are a known cause of immune
deficiency often prescribed to AIDS patients to counteract the muscle
wasting caused by AZT.198 Antibiotics, especially when used
habitually, can cause yeast infection and diarrhea, two conditions
that can lead to malnutrition.199 Septra and Bactrim are sulfonamide
antibiotics commonly prescribed for continuous, prophylactic or
preventative use by HIV positives. These drugs are leftover from the
days before penicillin; they do not target invading microbes as
narrowly as modern antibiotics and are notorious for their side
effects.200 Both cause nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, anorexia, bone
marrow destruction, rashes, fever, hepatitis, and anemia by
interfering with the production of red blood cells.201
The immunosuppressive effects of recreational drug abuse are
well-documented in medical literature dating back to the turn of the
century. They include pneumonias, mouth sores, fevers, endocarditis,
bacterial infections and night sweats-all conditions now associated
with AIDS.202 Amphetamine drugs suppress the appetite, causing chronic
users to suffer from malnutrition. Many habitual users of heroin and
crack do not provide themselves with adequate food, sleep, shelter and
healthcare.
Prolonged exposure to common chemical toxins such as insecticides and
herbicides can also impair immune function.203
Biological Risk Factors
These risks include multiple exposures to and/or chronic infections
with syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia and other venereal diseases,
hepatitis, tuberculosis, malaria, fungal diseases, amoebas and
parasites such as giardia, bacterial infections such as staph and E
coli, chronic bowel infections, blood transfusions, and the use of
blood products. In addition to the damaging effects of recurrent
infections, many of the pharmaceuticals used as treatment have adverse
effects on immune function.
Factor VIII (the blood clotting agent used by hemophiliacs) and blood
transfusions are immune suppressive and leave patients vulnerable to
infection.204 Due to the serious conditions for which transfusions are
necessary and the deleterious effects they have on the immune system,
half of all HIV negative transfusion recipients die within a year of
receiving a transfusion.204
Psychological Risk Factors
Chronic anxiety, panic, stress and depression have been shown to
compromise health, damage immune function, and result in symptoms
identical to AIDS.205 Mental stress provokes production of the hormone
cortisol; excessive cortisol causes rapid and dramatic reductions in T
cells, a condition known as lymphocytopenia. Within minutes, stress
induces cortisol levels to increase as much as 20-fold. High levels of
cortisol can eventually cause what medical texts describe as
"significant atrophy of all the lymphoid tissue throughout the body"
which may lead to "fulminating infection and death from diseases that
would otherwise not be lethal."206
A profound fear of AIDS is enough to cause even people who repeatedly
test HIV negative to develop physical symptoms of AIDS.207 Termed
"AIDS-phobia," this condition is characterized by weight loss,
wasting, reduced T cell counts and other signs considered indicative
of AIDS, and typically follows intimate contact with people who
sufferers believe may be HIV positive.
Beliefs and expectations are well-known to manifest in the physical
body. The life-altering influence of beliefs was detailed dramatically
in 1942 by Dr. Walter B. Cannon in his accounts of a phenomenon he
called "voodoo death," a form of capital punishment practiced among
certain Aboriginal tribes. Cannon reported that shaman, tribal medical
authorities thought to possess special powers, were able to kill
errant tribe members by simply pointing at them with a bone. Convinced
of the shaman's ability to invoke a lethal curse, the people pointed
at died within a matter of hours or days.208
In modern medicine, the power of expectation is a commonly accepted
fact known as the "placebo effect." Placebos are inert chemical
substances disguised as active preparations and given to patients in
place of drugs. The health benefits gained from a placebo occur
because the person taking it expects a positive effect. Since the
benefits of any drug may be due in part to this placebo effect, most
new drugs are tested against a placebo preparation.209
A recent study conducted at the University of Toronto demonstrated the
profound physiological effects of expectation with regard to placebos.
Researchers found that cardiac patients who strictly adhered to a
placebo treatment regimen lived longer than patients who did not take
their placebo regularly. In summarizing the study, lead researcher Dr.
Paul Dorian noted, "What you believe has an important influence on
your outcome."210
How These Risk Factors Apply to All AIDS Groups
There is not one case of AIDS described in the medical literature that
does not include one or more immune-destroying health risk factors.
There is no case of AIDS documented in a person whose sole risk is
exposure to HIV. Every case of AIDS involves factors known to damage
the immune system and leave a person vulnerable to debilitating
infection and deadly illness.211
Men Who Have Sex With Men
Well-documented causes of immune dysfunction can explain AIDS
illnesses among men who have sex with men although none of these
causes are unique to this risk group or can be generalized to include
all gay men. In fact, focusing attention on certain sexual practices
rather than recognized health risks obscures our understanding of
immune suppression and limits approaches to preventing and resolving
AIDS.
Nitrites, more commonly known as poppers, are immune-suppressive,
carcinogenic drugs chronically used by some gay men. At one time, 95%
of gay men in major urban areas like Los Angeles, New York and San
Francisco reported using poppers.212 Nitrite use correlates with
Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, two AIDS-defining
cancers found almost exclusively in this risk group.213 There are
several studies that further strengthen the correlation between
poppers and KS by documenting KS in HIV negative gay men who use
poppers.213 KS is hardly ever found among members of any other CDC
risk group or among women with AIDS, and is never diagnosed in
children or infants with AIDS.213 In 1981 when AIDS was first
identified, half of all AIDS diagnoses were for KS. As popper use has
diminished, so has KS which since 1993 has accounted for less than 5%
of all new AIDS cases.214
In the only studies that asked gay men with AIDS about recreational
drugs, 93% to 100% of participants acknowledged using cocaine, crack
cocaine, poppers, heroin, ecstasy, methamphetamines like speed and
crystal, and/or Special K (an animal tranquilizer).215
Combinations of parasitic infections that include amebiasis and
giardiasis along with rectal infections, syphilis, and gonorrhea can
result in acute diarrhea which in turn causes malabsorption and
malnutrition, or wasting.216 This collection of infections and
resultant problems was commonly known as Gay Bowel Syndrome in the
years before AIDS.216 The CDC reports that 20% to 50% of all gay men
in major US cities have been treated, often repeatedly, for intestinal
parasites using immune suppressive pharmaceutical drugs.217 Antibiotic
treatments for recurrent venereal infections are immune suppressive,
as is the practice of using these antibiotics on a regular basis as a
prevention. Steroids are another immune damaging drug frequently
prescribed to offset the wasting caused by diarrhea and
malabsorption.217
Campaigns that encourage HIV testing, the consuming of toxic AIDS
drugs, and living in fear of AIDS are primarily directed at the gay
community. Many gay magazines may have up to half of their commercial
advertising devoted to AIDS-related promotions.218 Such constant
emphasis on AIDS gives rise to the notion of the inevitability of
AIDS, a belief which can evoke chronic terror, despair and
hopelessness-psychological risk factors known to impair immunity and
compromise health.
The chance of registering false positive on an HIV test is greater for
people with high levels of non-HIV antibodies and microbes in their
blood. Antibodies produced in response to the particular microbial and
viral infections frequently found in some gay men are documented
causes of false positive HIV test results.218
For people who test HIV positive, the drugs prescribed as preventative
treatments for opportunistic AIDS-defining infections become harmful
and even deadly when used on a daily, continuous basis. Bactrim and
Septra, for example, are powerful sulfonamide antibiotics that kill
digestive flora and cause anemia and bone marrow destruction. The
anti-HIV drugs AZT, ddI, D4T, ddC and 3TC are all highly toxic
chemotherapies that destroy the immune and digestive systems, in
addition to causing five of the 29 official AIDS-defining
illnesses.2199 Two 1993 studies conducted in the US and Canada found
that every one of several hundred gay men with AIDS had a history of
significant recreational drug and/or AIDS drug use.220
Identifying this risk group as people who engage in habitual,
prolonged use of recreational and/or pharmaceutical drugs, have
chronic exposure to a multitude of infectious microbes, who suffer
from chronic malnourishment and/or chronic fear of HIV and AIDS
provides a more appropriate and comprehensive explanation of immune
suppression that invites many possibilities for prevention and
resolution.
Injection Drug Users
Members of this risk group account for 35% of all diagnosed AIDS
cases, while another 4% of people diagnosed with AIDS cite
heterosexual contact with injection drug users as their sole risk.
However, the majority of people who initially claim intimate contact
with IV drug users as their only risk later acknowledge taking drugs
themselves.221
Considering only injection drug use as a high risk activity for AIDS
disregards the immune suppressive effects brought about by habitual
use of non-injected street drugs as well as the many
health-compromising factors that can accompany the regular, long-term
use of illicit chemicals. The emphasis on sharing needles over the
damaging effects of the narcotics injected with the needles distorts
our view of immune dysfunction and prevents application of practical
solutions to the health problems common to this risk group.
Prolonged, habitual consumption of drugs such as heroin, crack, speed,
and cocaine, whether taken by injection or other means, is well-known
to disable immune function. Chronic use of these drugs is documented
to bring about many conditions synonymous with AIDS including
pneumonias, tuberculosis, mouth sores, fevers, night sweats, bacterial
infections, and endocarditis. Malnutrition-the number one cause of
immune deficiency diseases worldwide-and multiple infections are
frequent side effects of habitual injection drug use, and are factors
that suppress immunity.
Antibodies generated in response to the multiple infections and
chemical toxins typical of chronic drug use can cause false positive
readings on HIV tests. Positive test results most frequently lead to
ongoing treatment with various immune suppressive antibiotics and
chemotherapy drugs, and to a sense of hopelessness and profound
despair.
A more compassionate and inclusive way to portray this diverse group
is as people who engage in habitual, prolonged use of recreational
drugs, have chronic exposure to a multitude of infectious microbes and
toxins through septic syringes or septic living conditions; who suffer
from chronic malnourishment, lack of adequate sleep, the immune
suppressive effects of AIDS drugs, and/or the chronic despair that
follows an HIV positive or AIDS diagnosis. The immune deficiency
diseases caused by these multiple and variant factors can be resolved
with treatments that do not involve toxic anti-HIV drugs and long-term
use of powerful antibiotics. 222
Transfusion Recipients and Hemophiliacs
Hemophiliacs and blood transfusion recipients together make up 2% of
adult AIDS cases in the US. As noted previously, Factor VIII, the
blood clotting treatment used by hemophiliacs, is itself immune
suppressive. Hemophilia is a life-threatening condition in people with
or without an HIV positive diagnosis. Ryan White, the young HIV
positive hemophiliac who became famous as an AIDS victim, actually
died of common complications attributed to hemophilia (internal
bleeding and liver failure), not of illnesses that define AIDS.223
Blood transfusions suppress the immune system. Medical experts note
that higher amounts of blood transfusions among hospitalized patients
correlate with higher death rates. The authors of one recent study on
transfusions specifically mention that the immune suppressive effects
of transfusions leave recipients vulnerable to deadly opportunistic
infection.224
Factor VIII and blood transfusions can cause positive results on HIV
antibody tests in persons never exposed to HIV by triggering the
production of antibodies that react with the nonspecific proteins used
in the HIV antibody test. Once a person has tested positive, they are
subject to immune suppressive drug treatment regimens, and the terror
of developing AIDS.
Members of these risk groups can be more accurately described as
people with serious preexisting health challenges, critical or chronic
exposure to immune suppressive blood products and toxic AIDS drugs,
and/or who are affected by the chronic despair of a fatal diagnosis.
Based on this view, immune compromising anti-HIV chemotherapy and
continuous antibiotic treatments would compound preexisting health
problems, rather than resolve them.
Heterosexual Contact
Six percent of Americans diagnosed with AIDS cite heterosexual contact
as their sole AIDS risk. However, upon further investigation, 60% to
99% of these people are reclassified as injection drug users and/or
men who have sex with men, groups with identifiable health risks
documented to cause immune dysfunction.225 As previously noted, people
diagnosed with AIDS voluntarily select a risk group from among six
categories determined by the CDC which limits health risks to possible
exposure to HIV through sex or blood.
The damage caused by AIDS chemotherapy and the acceptance of a fatal
diagnosis are sufficient to bring about serious illness and even death
in people with no other risk factors.
Members of this group may be better described as people with no health
risk factors acknowledged by the CDC who, because of their positive
HIV status, regularly consume chemotherapy and/or engage in continuous
treatment with antibiotics and other immune suppressive pharmaceutical
drugs, and/or suffer from the chronic panic and hopelessness of a
fatal diagnosis.
Adolescents, Children and Infants
Although teenagers and children are not a specific AIDS risk group,
cases of AIDS among young people, however rare, are a matter of great
concern. The fact that babies are diagnosed with AIDS has been used as
an argument against non-HIV explanations for AIDS illnesses. Despite
widely held beliefs, the majority of AIDS cases that occur among
children and adolescents can be explained by the same causes of immune
suppression prevalent in adults with AIDS.
In 1998, new AIDS cases among this country's 26 million teens totaled
293; of these, 229 offered information which placed them in the two
primary CDC defined AIDS risk groups for adults.226
Over 80% of the mothers of babies diagnosed with AIDS voluntarily
acknowledge using injection drugs during pregnancy, a practice which
almost universally results in intrauterine malnutrition. The remaining
cases of AIDS in infants and children may be due to the immune
suppressive medical treatments given in response to an HIV positive
test result, or to the same factors that cause HIV negative babies to
suffer from pneumonia, bacterial infections, and immune disorders. In
1998, new AIDS cases in children age 13 and under totaled 382.227
Residents of Developing Nations
In stark contrast to the US and Europe, AIDS cases in developing areas
of the world are found almost exclusively among non-drug using
heterosexuals.228 Mainstream AIDS experts offer no plausible reason
why AIDS would spread primarily through drug-free heterosexual contact
only outside the US and Europe.
A coherent explanation for AIDS cases in developing areas of the world
is the well-known health risks shared by these countries-widespread
poverty and malnutrition; lack of clean water, a regular food supply,
and sanitary living conditions; limited access to medical care;
endemic diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria, and parasitic
infections that manifest in conditions identical to AIDS; and the
practice of diagnosing AIDS based on a nonspecific set of clinical
symptoms.
Although HIV tests are not required for an AIDS diagnosis in many
parts of the world, widespread exposure to hepatitis, tuberculosis,
leprosy, malaria and other conditions are more than sufficient to
account for positive results on the nonspecific HIV antibody tests.229
Resolving the immune suppressive conditions caused by poverty and
malnutrition provides a means to alleviate the suffering of many
people in developing nations who are currently counted and treated as
victims of AIDS.
When considering non-HIV explanations for AIDS, consider that:
AIDS is a collection of familiar illnesses, not a disease. Since
1993, more than half of all new AIDS diagnoses in the US are given to
people who are not ill. In 1997, two-thirds of Americans diagnosed
with AIDS had no symptoms or illness.* Acquired immune deficiency
predates the creation of the category "AIDS" and has numerous,
well-documented causes. There are no AIDS cases noted in the medical
literature in which exposure to HIV has proved to be the sole health
risk factor. There are well-documented causes for every AIDS disease
that do not involve HIV, and all illnesses now called AIDS occur in
the absence of HIV. HIV tests do not test for the actual virus, but
for antiviral proteins or genetic material that are not specific to
HIV. The chance of a positive reaction on a nonspecific HIV antibody
test increases proportionately with the level of other antibodies and
microbes found in the blood. Five of the six AIDS risk groups defined
by the CDC have health risk factors that involve multiple, chronic
exposure to viruses, bacteria and other antigens known to produce
antibodies identical to those associated with HIV. Once a person has
tested HIV antibody positive, chemotherapy and other immune
suppressing chemicals are almost always prescribed for treatment or
prevention of AIDS. Alternative explanations for AIDS provide
opportunities for effective AIDS prevention and for using practical,
nontoxic approaches to resolving AIDS.
* 1997 was the last year that the CDC provided information on how many
AIDS cases were diagnosed in people who are not sick.
This is a chapter from the book
What if everything you thought about AIDS was wrong?
Christine Maggiore
Related sites:
http://www.aliveandwell.org
http://healtoronto.com
So the issue gets murkier. I still subscribe to the HIV cuases AIDS thing and the transmissibility thereof, because I find it boggling that we would have got this far in our methodology without having some empirical research that backs it up. I just haven't done the research to look at it, and it's not that high in my life's prioritized list of the moment.
I do, however, begin to wonder. I'd like to see some hard facts and analysis, some that firmly conforms to the scientific method.